
AthenaHQ Review: GEO & AI Citation Intelligence
GEO/AEO suite focused on AI citations, content gaps, and opportunity discovery.
User Rating
~4.5/5
Starting Price
~$200+/mo (typical mid‑range)
Features
AEO / GEO
LLM Visibility
Analytics & Reporting
AthenaHQ is a GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) and AEO platform focused on AI citations, content gaps, and opportunity discovery across multiple AI engines.
AthenaHQ Overview
- Website: https://athenahq.ai
- Category: AEO / GEO, LLM Visibility, Analytics & Reporting
- Best For: Agencies, in‑house SEO teams, growth teams at content and SaaS companies
- Typical Use Cases:
Key Features of AthenaHQ
- AI citation tracking for brands, products, and competitors
- Content gap analysis specifically for AI answers
- Opportunity scoring for prompts and topics
- Dashboards for monitoring AI coverage over time
- Exportable insights for SEO and content roadmaps
AthenaHQ Pricing
| Plan | Approx. Starting Price | Ideal User Type |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ~\$200–\$300/month | Growth teams, small agencies |
| Scale | Higher monthly | Mid‑size agencies, SaaS |
| Enterprise | Custom | Large, multi‑brand orgs |
Exact pricing is typically quote‑based and depends on brands, markets, and tracked entities.
AthenaHQ Reviews & Ratings
- Average user rating: around 4.5/5 in GEO and AEO tool roundups.
- Users often highlight its ability to surface “missing AI answers” as a major differentiator.
Sample User Sentiment (Paraphrased)
“AthenaHQ surfaces the missing AI answers our competitors already own and turns them into a clear opportunity list.”
Pros of AthenaHQ
- Strong focus on AI citations and content gaps
- Useful opportunity scoring for prioritizing work
- Built for teams that already understand search and content strategy
- Helpful dashboards for product and content leaders
Cons of AthenaHQ
- Not intended as a full SEO suite
- Pricing and setup favor mid‑size teams, not hobby projects
- Requires dedicated owners to act on its opportunity lists
Who Prefers AthenaHQ?
- Agencies responsible for strategic content planning
- In‑house SEO teams at SaaS and content‑heavy brands
- Growth teams that combine SEO, product, and content initiatives
Alternatives to AthenaHQ
- Gauge – GEO platform with deeper prompt‑level tracking
- Rank Prompt – More SEO‑style tracking focused on prompts
- Fibr AI – Multi‑LLM visibility with competitor breakdowns
- GetCito – AEO with stronger schema and SERP emphasis
Profound Review: Enterprise AI Search Analytics
Profound is an enterprise‑grade AI search analytics and AEO platform that measures brand presence, risk, and performance across AI‑generated answers and agents.
Profound Overview
- Website: https://profound.tools
- Category: AEO / GEO, LLM Visibility, Analytics & Reporting
- Best For: Enterprise, regulated industries, large in‑house SEO teams
- Typical Use Cases:
Key Features of Profound
- AI answer monitoring across multiple LLMs and AI overviews
- Brand accuracy and risk scoring
- Enterprise dashboards with market, product, and topic breakdowns
- Alerting for harmful or inaccurate AI descriptions
- Integrations with BI and reporting stacks
Profound Pricing
| Plan | Approx. Starting Price | Ideal User Type |
|---|---|---|
| Lite | ~$499/month | Single brand, enterprise SEO |
| Business | Higher monthly | Multi‑brand enterprises |
| Custom | Custom | Highly regulated industries |
Profound focuses on enterprise contracts; exact pricing often requires a sales conversation.
Profound Reviews & Ratings
- Average ratings in 2025 enterprise reviews: ~4.3–4.6/5.
- Users highlight its dashboards and risk/compliance focus as key differentiators.
Sample User Sentiment (Paraphrased)
“Profound gives us executive‑ready visuals showing where AI gets our brand wrong and what we should fix first.”
Pros of Profound
- Built for enterprise scale and governance
- Strong risk and compliance‑oriented feature set
- Useful for regulated verticals (finance, health, etc.)
- Designed for multi‑brand and multi‑market setups
Cons of Profound
- Pricing is not friendly to small teams or freelancers
- Implementation usually requires buy‑in from several stakeholders
- May be more complex than necessary for simple visibility tracking
Who Prefers Profound?
- Enterprise marketing and SEO departments
- Brand & comms teams in regulated categories
- In‑house SEO teams needing compliance‑grade visibility reports
Alternatives to Profound
- Gauge – GEO‑focused AI answer visibility with strong experimentation
- Goodie – Share‑of‑voice and brand analytics across AI search
- Rank Prompt – Slimmer, SEO‑style AI rank tracking
- Fibr AI – GEO and AI visibility with more mid‑market appeal
Related Tools

Profound Review: Enterprise AI Search Analytics
Enterprise AI‑search analytics platform measuring brand presence and safety across AI answers.
~4.3–4.6/5
~$499/mo
AEO / GEO
LLM Visibility
Analytics & Reporting
Image unavailable
Otterly AI Review: Brand Narrative Tracking in AI
Tracks brand responses across AI engines to show how you are described and cited.
~4.4/5
~$49/mo
AEO / GEO
LLM Visibility
Analytics & Reporting

Rank Prompt Review: AI Visibility & AEO Platform
AEO‑first AI visibility platform tracking how brands and prompts appear across major LLMs.
~4.2–4.5/5
~$29/mo
AEO / GEO
LLM Visibility
Analytics & Reporting